Fannie Mae Easing DTI Standards Impacts Your Ability To Get a Mortgage

Gentle Readers,
Remember when I learned that FHA guidance would make it much harder for me to get a mortgage any time soon? Things are changing, potentially.
Fannie Mae is changing their debt-to-income (DTI) formula. This will allow some folks to qualify for a mortgage who could not under the old standards.  The old DTI maximum was 45%, but at the end of July, it will be 50%.

What is the DTI Formula?

The DTI is simple to calculate. All of your debts go on the left of the colon and your income goes on the right. Then divide your debt by your income and multiple by 100.  That is your DTI percentage.
  • If I make $4000 a month, and have debt obligations of $2000, I have a DTI of 50% and am just barely eligible.  2000:4000  (2000/4000)100=50%
  • If I make $4000 a month, and have debt obligations of $1800, I have a DTI of 45% and am eligible.  (1800/4000)100=45%
This applicable DTI seems to be for Fannie Mae mortgages and not Freddie Mac or Federal Housing Administration mortgages. Their standards may or may not change to fall in line.

What does this DTI standard mean for me?

I’m not sure that this is a good move. The more debt you have relative to your income, the harder it is to pay for everything you need. This is true even without emergencies cropping up. Perhaps if the rent in your market is outrageous in comparison to your potential mortgage + insurance + maintenance, then this could be a boon for you.

 

This change still seems risky. Everything in the US market seems frothy right now. Real estate and other investment prices do not seem to correspond to the underlying asset values in a lot of markets. It does not seem like now should be the time for loosening our standards. Just because you can receive a mortgage, that does not mean it is financially responsible.

 

The next thing I need to research on my quest to own a condo is the Fannie Mae Homepath program.

 

What do you think of the new DTI requirement? Good for the market or for individuals? 

Trump’s First Executive Order and Your Mortgage

Gentle Readers,

You remember when I learned last summer that changes in FHA Mortgage Guidance would alter my ability to acquire a mortgage. My debt to income ratio has not improved significantly in the past 6 months, as anticipated. I did not think I would be able to pay off $45000, commonly referred to as SL2.

One of Trump’s first acts as the new President of the United States was to make mortgages harder to acquire for middle class folks.

The previous administration had a policy that Trump’s Administration blocked immediately upon assuming office. The policy was on track to reduce the cost of mortgages slightly for many home buyers. The policy was not yet in effect, but was imminently going to impact folks.

What policy are we talking about?

HUD sent a letter suspending the 0.25 % point premium rate cut for FHA-backed loans.  Nearly 20% of mortgages are FHA-backed. The beauty of the FHA is that their criteria make it accessible for more people to access capital necessary to buy a home and enjoy the tax benefits of home ownership. Their most-touted benefit is the significantly lower down-payment. As low as 3.5% of the purchase price. Homes in my high COL area regularly go for over $400,000. A standard 20% down payment is $80,000. A 3.5% down payment is $14,000. It is not hard to see why so many Americans need the help afforded by FHA.

How big is this impact?

Frankly, not big at all. The cut Obama attempted to enact would have saved homeowners with a $400,000 mortgage $58 per month.  Not insignificant, but not overwhelming for most people shopping for a mortgage.

The housing market in parts of the country, mine included, have been on fire lately. The prices are sky-rocketing. Some folks look at high prices and want in. It is unclear if this action will throw water on the housing bubble, but it might.

The most fascinating part for me is that Trump has re-made the fortune he was gifted by understanding the benefits our tax code gives to real estate. Having learned every trick in the book, is he going to encourage the IRS to re-write the book? May the US end a half-century long policy of encouraging home ownership through the tax code? If they did, would that be a bad thing necessarily?

A lot remains to be seen, but I think these tea leaves are impossible to read just yet.

Would you be happy to amend US tax code and move away from a home ownership model?